My conversation with Eduardo challenged many of my own feelings about the Olympics, namely my idealistic vision of this as an all-encompassing event that brings everyone from around the globe together in harmony. I was deeply saddened to think that in many ways, he was right, and that he would likely never get to enjoy the Olympic Games in the way that millions of others around the world can. I felt frustrated for him, and frustrated that this thing that I cherish so much is ultimately serving as a detriment to the people it’s mean to celebrate.
On the other hand, I felt validated around my belief that the Olympics can indeed be a mechanism for positive change, if and only if we rethink the model and the approach. Much of what Thomas Bach is trying to do with Agenda 2020 is attempting tackling this in the long-term; but there still remains a need to shift the legacy perception and culture around the Olympic Movement to be something that is designed to move communities forward, rather than pull them backwards. Our world looks different in nearly every way than it did twenty or thirty years ago; technology, population, infrastructure, mobility, urban planning have all changed so drastically, and require a different approach to how the Olympic Games are shaped and structured.
It was important for me to hear Eduardo’s story, and to gain empathy for his anger and frustration at his government. We cannot change what has already been put into effect here at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, but I’m certain there is opportunity to explore the ways in which we can design for opportunities like this at future Games, and create a truly universal and sustainable experience.